Comments on: WWW or Non-WWW, That is the Question http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/ Industrial Search Engine Marketing Resources : by Ecreativeworks Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:09:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: DVD Ripper http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-5170 DVD Ripper Thu, 29 Jul 2010 03:12:33 +0000 http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/#comment-5170 I like this article, this article that i learned a lot of knowledge. I like this article, this article that i learned a lot of knowledge.

]]> By: Best Hosting http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1706 Best Hosting Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:49:32 +0000 http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/#comment-1706 I think , when the domain name of any site is long, using non-www is good choice . thanks for information I think , when the domain name of any site is long, using non-www is good choice .

thanks for information

]]> By: wow power leveling http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1619 wow power leveling Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:01:48 +0000 http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/#comment-1619 Wow, this is very useful.. Thanks for sharing this and hoping I could implement it too. Wow, this is very useful.. Thanks for sharing this and hoping I could implement it too.

]]> By: Jesse Donat http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1489 Jesse Donat Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:34:45 +0000 http://www.industrialsearchenginemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/26/www-or-non-www-that-is-the-question/#comment-1489 As a developer, not an SEO, www is a silly left over from the 1995 age of the internet. I haven't typed a www. in front of a domain in years. In 99% of cases, its a waste of my time, your time, everyones time. Theres no advantage to having it as long as www 301 redirrects to not www. Moreover, quoting no-www.org "Mail servers do not require you to send emails to recipient@mail.domain.com. Likewise, web servers should allow access to their pages though the main domain unless a particular subdomain is required." Frankly www is remnant of the distant past that should be forgotten. As a developer, not an SEO, www is a silly left over from the 1995 age of the internet. I haven’t typed a www. in front of a domain in years. In 99% of cases, its a waste of my time, your time, everyones time. Theres no advantage to having it as long as www 301 redirrects to not www. Moreover, quoting no-www.org “Mail servers do not require you to send emails to recipient@mail.domain.com. Likewise, web servers should allow access to their pages though the main domain unless a particular subdomain is required.” Frankly www is remnant of the distant past that should be forgotten.

]]>